Definition: And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any [man] from that day forth ask him any more [questions].

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this incredibly important verse from Matthew 22:46. It’s often misunderstood, so let's go through it piece by piece: What it says: “And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any [man] from that day forth ask him any more questions.” Simple Explanation: This verse describes a moment of profound silence and disbelief when Jesus encountered someone who was incredibly powerful – likely a religious leader or someone trying to provoke him. Let’s unpack it into smaller parts: “No man was able to answer him a word…” This means that no one, even the most learned scholars , could respond to Jesus with a coherent question. It wasn't just a momentary pause; there was absolutely no response. “…neither durst any [man] from that day forth ask him any more questions.” This is the key part! “Durst” means to be afraid or unwilling to do something. The phrase "neither durst" means no one felt fear enough to continue asking Jesus questions. It’s a complete lack of willingness to engage in conversation. What it's really about: This verse is a powerful illustration of several important theological concepts: Jesus’ Authority & Divine Presence: It highlights that Jesus is completely and utterly in control. He is not just answering questions, but he is the answer to every question. The Power of Faith: It demonstrates that faith and belief are essential. When we truly believe in something, we're often able to transcend our own fear and challenge even the most powerful forces. It’s about more than just understanding; it’s about trusting in a higher power. The Importance of Listening: It emphasizes that sometimes, the best response isn't a question, but simply listening and allowing the truth to unfold. In essence, this verse is a snapshot of Jesus’ complete authority and the transformative power of faith. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Provide context for this passage (like when it happened)? Discuss its significance in different traditions or interpretations?